Frequently Asked Questions

We are committed to an average of 24 hours for first decision and an average of 72 hours for our double-blind, independent, high-quality peer review process.

After submission, your manuscript undergoes an initial editorial screening within an average of 24 hours. If deemed suitable for review, you will be asked to complete the Article Processing Charge (APC). Once payment is confirmed, the manuscript enters our high-quality, double-blind, and revolutionary peer-review process, completed within 72 hours. You will then receive reviewers' comments and have 14 days to submit your revisions. Upon resubmission, the manuscript proceeds to a final editorial decision, copy editing, and publishing within an average of 24 hours.

Yes! Our author dashboard provides real-time tracking with a visual progress bar showing stages: Draft → Submitted → 1st Decision → Payment → Peer Review → Comments → Editing → Published. Each stage includes timestamps and estimated completion times.

You can always resubmit as a new paper following our standard submission process.

After initial editor approval and before the peer review starting. This ensures high quality and fast peer review.

Absolutely not. Our pricing is completely transparent with no hidden fees. The stated APC covers all services including peer review, editing, formatting, DOI assignment, indexing, and permanent archiving. We believe in clear, upfront pricing.

Yes, provided they provide legal documents, and they will be subject to 20% discount.

Every published article receives a unique Digital Object Identifier (DOI) ensuring permanent accessibility and proper citation tracking. DOIs are assigned immediately upon publication and registered with CrossRef.

Articles typically appear in PMC within 2-3 weeks of publication, in Scopus on average within 4-8 weeks, and in Web of Science on average within 6-12 weeks, subject to journal and database processing times.

Our reviewer network spans all medical, nursing, biological, and health science specialties, bringing together practicing clinicians, researchers, and academics dedicated to advancing evidence-based knowledge. Each reviewer is carefully vetted for subject expertise, publication record, and commitment to providing timely and constructive feedback. We operate a double-blind peer review system to ensure impartiality and rigor. Through our innovative and accelerated review process, we are redefining academic publishing—maintaining top-tier quality while challenging the industry's long review cycles.

We ensure review quality through a double-blind peer review system and a vetted network of expert reviewers across all health disciplines. Our structured review templates and editorial checks maintain rigor and fairness at every step. This process delivers fast yet high-quality evaluations, balancing speed with scientific integrity.

We maintain specific word limits for each submission type to ensure clarity and consistency. The word count applies to the main body text only, excluding references, tables, and figures. Original Research articles may include up to 5,000 words, while Review Articles may reach 6,000 words. Case Reports should not exceed 2,000 words, and Technical Reports are limited to 3,000 words. Editorials have a maximum of 1,500 words, and Audit Reports may include up to 2,500 words. Poster submissions should be concise, with a maximum of 1,000 words, whereas PowerPoint Presentations may include up to 50 slides. Video Submissions are limited to a total duration of 10 minutes duration per video, with maximum of 3 videos per submission.

All research must comply with ethical standards including IRB/Ethics Committee approval for human studies, informed consent documentation, animal welfare protocols (where applicable), and conflict of interest disclosures.